Question:
what is the best RAID type to use for SQL server?
mart061
2009-06-22 04:06:58 UTC
I am planning to setup 2 SQL server and cluster both servers, i wanted to know which RAID type can maximize the the ability of both clustered server with regards to data accessing and i want to make sure that the data will be safe in case any trouble arise
Three answers:
cpt.Kool-Aid
2009-06-22 04:18:46 UTC
Don't hold me to this now, but i think your going to want to go with Raid 5. In your example you want speed, reliability, and ease. Raid 5 is your man. Raid 5 is a great choice but you may also look into Raid 3, it performs much the same way as Raid 5 however if one drive fails, they will not all receive a performance hit like in raid 5, however all drives must be spinning in sync... You may be wondering what the advantage of Raid 5 is then ey? Well, With Raid 5 you can specify the Physical Block size and it uses an "interleave" data method to write and read on that block specified, were as Raid 3 uses parity methodology. I don't know too much else about raid systems.

- hope i helped some... -

P.S: like my indepth answers? give me a big ol' thumbs up, letting me know so :D...
Rajesh B
2009-06-23 08:03:42 UTC
You can check this video tutorial on

SAN SQL Server Cluster Sizing and How to Plan Implementation

at

http://wtv.watchtechvideos.com/topic216.html



You will get complete picture on RAID, Sizing etc
smokingwheels
2009-06-22 11:42:41 UTC
How much money do you have to spend?

Go for a Hardware Raid Controller with hot spare configured.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID for more info.

I have only used adaptec controllers in the past.

RAID can involve significant computation when reading and writing information. With traditional "real" RAID hardware, a separate controller does this computation.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...