Question:
dual core confusions ?
2007-01-24 07:14:38 UTC
i am buying a new PC i have 2.4 HT technology.
now i am buying dual core 2.8 2MB cache
my question is HT is included in dual core ?
which one is better dual core or core 2 duo ?
Six answers:
ceresia_blade
2007-01-24 07:21:45 UTC
HT just uses one core and two lets say pipes to process information and trick the OS into thinking it has two processors.

Dual core is actually two core processors each with their own cache.

The difference between Core 2 duo and dual core is cache

Core 2 duo should have up to 4MB cache, which allows for faster boot times and faster opening of programs as long as the software utilizes the dual cores.
2007-01-24 07:20:30 UTC
HT is Hyper Threading & it is not included in Dual Core.

core 2 duo is better as it is 40% more efficient than dual core & is a two-way processing system.
2007-01-24 08:01:08 UTC
Originally.Intel came out with dual core to compete with AMD's dual core CPU's.But AMD's versions were faster.So Intel developed the Core 2 Duo to take back the lead.

The Dual core CPU has Dual cores and the Core 2 Duo has two cores.

Intel's original dual core CPU's ('Core Duo') are different than their just released new dual core, 'Core 2 Duo'. The new version runs calculations much faster and it is much more energy efficient, thus running much cooler.
Surya Prakash
2007-01-24 07:21:51 UTC
both are the same thing in a sense as in both the cases there are two processors on the single Chip. So just go fore the speed only, forget whether its dual core or core 2 duo.
Kokopelli
2007-01-24 07:20:20 UTC
Yes, HT is supported. See the link below.
2007-01-24 18:03:12 UTC
A multi-core microprocessor is one that combines two or more independent processors into a single package, often a single integrated circuit (IC). A dual-core device contains two independent microprocessors. In general, multi-core microprocessors allow a computing device to exhibit some form of thread-level parallelism (TLP) without including multiple microprocessors in separate physical packages. This form of TLP is often known as chip-level multiprocessing.



Terminology



There is some discrepancy in the semantics by which the terms "multi-core" and "dual-core" are defined. Most commonly they are used to refer to some sort of central processing unit (CPU), but are sometimes also applied to DSPs and SoCs. Additionally, some use these terms only to refer to multi-core microprocessors that are manufactured on the same integrated circuit die. These people generally prefer to refer to separate microprocessor dies in the same package by another name, such as "multi-chip module", "double core", or even "twin core". This article uses both the terms "multi-core" and "dual-core" to reference microelectronic CPUs manufactured on the same integrated circuit, unless otherwise noted.



While CMOS manufacturing technology continues to improve, reducing the size of single gates, physical limits of semiconductor-based microelectronics become a major design concern. Some effects of these physical limitations can cause significant heat dissipation and data synchronization problems. The demand for more complex and capable microprocessors causes CPU designers to utilize various methods of increasing performance. Some instruction-level parallelism (ILP) methods like superscalar pipelining are suitable for many applications, but are inefficient for others that tend to contain difficult-to-predict code. Many applications are better suited to TLP methods, and multiple independent CPUs is one common method used to increase a system's overall TLP. A combination of increased available space due to refined manufacturing processes and the demand for increased TLP is the logic behind the creation of multi-core CPUs.



[edit] Commercial incentives



Several business motives drive the development of dual-core architectures. Since Symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) designs have been long implemented using discrete CPUs, the issues regarding implementing the architecture and supporting it in software are well known. Additionally, utilizing a proven processing core design (e.g. Freescale's e700 core) without architectural changes reduces design risk significantly. Finally, the connotation of the terminology "dual-core" (and other multiples) lends itself to marketing efforts.



Additionally, for general-purpose processors, much of the motivation for multi-core processors comes from the increasing difficulty of improving processor performance by increasing the operating frequency (frequency-scaling). In order to continue delivering regular performance improvements for general-purpose processors, manufacturers such as Intel and AMD have turned to multi-core designs, sacrificing lower manufacturing costs for higher performance in some applications and systems.



Multi-core architectures are being developed, but so are the alternatives. An especially strong contender for established markets is to integrate more peripheral functions into the chip.



[edit] Advantages



* Proximity of multiple CPU cores on the same die have the advantage that the cache coherency circuitry can operate at a much higher clock rate than is possible if the signals have to travel off-chip, so combining equivalent CPUs on a single die significantly improves the performance of cache snoop (alternative: Bus snooping) operations. In simpler words, it means that because the signal between different chips has to travel a shorter distance, it does not degenerate as much, which allows more data to be sent at the same period of time - as individual signals can be shorter and do not need to be repeated as often.

* Assuming that the die can fit into the package, physically, the multi-core CPU designs require much less Printed Circuit Board (PCB) space than multi-chip SMP designs.

* A dual-core processor uses slightly less power than two coupled single-core processors, principally because of the increased power required to drive signals external to the chip and because the smaller silicon process geometry allows the cores to operate at lower voltages; such reduction reduces latency. Furthermore, the cores share some circuitry, like the L2 cache and the interface to the front side bus (FSB).

* In terms of competing technologies for the available silicon die area, multi-core design can make use of proven CPU core library designs and produce a product with lower risk of design error than devising a new wider core design. Also, adding more cache suffers from diminishing returns.



[edit] Disadvantages



* In addition to operating system (OS) support, adjustments to existing software are required to maximize utilization of the computing resources provided by multi-core processors. Also, the ability of multi-core processors to increase application performance depends on the use of multiple threads within applications. For example, most current (2006) video games will run faster on a 3 GHz single-core processor than on a 2GHz dual-core processor (of the same core architecture), despite the dual-core theoretically having more processing power, because they are incapable of efficiently using more than one core at a time.[1]

* Integration of a multi-core chip drives production yields down and they are more difficult to manage thermally than lower-density single-chip designs.

* From an architectural point of view, ultimately, single CPU designs may make better use of the silicon surface area than multiprocessing cores, so a development commitment to this architecture may carry the risk of obsolescence.

* Raw processing power is not the only constraint on system performance. Two processing cores sharing the same system bus and memory bandwidth limits the real-world performance advantage. If a single core is close to being memory bandwidth limited, going to dual-core might only give 30% to 70% improvement. If memory-bandwidth is not a problem a 90% improvement can be expected. It would be possible for an application that used 2 CPUs to end up running faster on one dual-core if communication between the CPUs was the limiting factor, which would count as more than 100% improvement.



[edit] Hardware trend



* Multi-core to many-core: from dual-, quad-, eight-core to tens or even hundreds of cores.

* Mixed with simultaneous multithreading or hyperthreading

* Heterogeneous: special purpose processors cores in addition to general purpose cores for higher efficiency in processing multimedia, recognition and networking applications

* Energy-efficiency: focus on performance-per-watt with advanced fine-grain or ultra fine-grain power management and dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS)

* Hardware-assisted platform virtualization

* Memory-on-chip


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...