Question:
How do I correctly interpret Video Cards (For PC Games)?
GD21Guns
2009-09-11 23:41:55 UTC
OK, the brand/type of video card I use is Nvidia GeForce 6100. I have recently bought Call Of Duty 4, and it lags so much because of my outdated Video Card.

Now obviously, I'm going to buy a new video card, but I need help. I usually just thought that the higher the number, e.g Nvidia GeForce 8800, Nvidia GeForce 9600, the better the performance of the card. However, I have heard that the first digit of the number does not matter (it only shows the series/family of card), and the last 3 digits are what matter if I am looking for better gaming performance. For example, Nvidia GeForce 8800 would be better than Nvidia GeForce 9400 because 800 is larger than 400.

Is this true? Please help me! Because I am desperate to play COD4 with better performance! :)
Six answers:
shindaiwa21
2009-09-12 05:53:52 UTC
Yes, what you are saying is generally true for BOTH ATi and nVidia, though family does matter sometimes. For instance, a HD 4670 has an edge on an HD 3850. Ideally, the mid level card of a new generation should match the top level card of the previous one. However, nVidia renames cards constantly. For instance, an 8800gt is a slower version of an 8800gts (512mb version, the 320mb and 640mb cards were different cores and different cards), which was sped up a bit more and called a 9800gtx. nVidia then decided to re-release the 8800gt as the 9800gt. Before the 9800gt came out they released a 2-in-1 double 8800gt called a 9800gx2. They also released a die shrink (improved manufacturing, slightly more juicable) of the 9800gtx called the 9800gtx+. The 9800gtx+ is now called the GTS 250. Basically the same core design has made it through three generations without any real change. For two generations it remained labled as a top model, and now it's labled as a entry-med range, even though it should really be the "6" card. Oh right, and the 8800gs was also the same core, weakened down, released in the 8 series. That was renamed the 9600gso. A lot of this naming confusion occurred because nVidia's 9 series was just a renaming of the 8 series cards for marketing purposes (and a lot of people went and got the 9800gtx thinking they were getting something new, when they were just getting an overclocked 8800gts with a $100 markup). The 8 series card names were then inconsistently transferred to 9 series card names. ATi pulled this same kind of garbage back in the X1900/X1950 series. Sorry for the video card history, I just thought I should make sure you know to really research what you're getting.



What I would recommend as a budget option is this 9600gso, formerly the 8800gs, for $35 with rebate from newegg.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121320&cm_re=9600gso-_-14-121-320-_-Product

It should play COD4 just fine, and it's practically the price of an intro card. You can spend like $90 and get a 9800gt or whatever, but truthful the difference will be quite small. Sure this will get outdated faster, but certainly not three times faster. The 9800gt might squeeze medium out of some future game which the 9600gso will only manage to get low out of. Either way, you'll want a new card when that day comes. For now, the 9600gso is fine for most games.



The 8800gs aka 9600gso was a poorly represented card in its day, sort of nVidias afterthought competition to the Radeon 3850. Anyway, it is about equal to the HD 3850 and HD 4670 if people have no idea what you're talking about.



I could play COD4 just fine on my 8600m GT on medium on my laptop. A 9600gso should eat it up no problemo.



Make sure your motherboard has a PCi-express X16 slot. I believe the card you currently have is actually integrated into the board. But you still probably have the express slot. Google a pic of a PCI-Expess x16 slot and look in your case to see if you have one.
2009-09-11 23:52:04 UTC
Firstly, Yes its true. x500 and x400 denotes entry level cards. x being the generation number, up to GeForce 9 anyway.



600 is mid range card, if you are a gamer, this is the bare minimum card you must have.



800 is the high end range of cards



Of course you have 8800GT, GTS, GTX



GTX faster than GTS, which is faster than GT





8800GT or 9800GT is the same card, just being re-brand with a new name. If you can afford this card, its the suitable card to play COD4, COD WAW and you should do fine with the next COD MW2 as well.



Either 9800GT or 8800GT, whichever you can find. Difference is 9800GT comes with HDMI output, if you wants to connect your card to a HD TV set. Otherwise, performance is the same, its the same graphic processor.
elmurto_52
2009-09-12 01:07:17 UTC
Yes this is true. The latest nvidia cards only have 3 numbers. The first is the family (2xx) and the other two numbers, the higher they are the better the card. Here is an article on video cards:



http://www.buildyourown-computer.com/Video_Card.html
Biff Stew
2009-09-11 23:50:39 UTC
The most recommended card for COD4 is the eVGA e-GeForce 8800 GTX 768, rating at 76 on gamespot.
demaria
2016-11-01 15:07:02 UTC
supported via, promoted via comparable difference:, its the image card chip makers way of arising you the patron run out and purchase their recent playing cards for the interest you particularly particularly need. I even have performed doom 3 a million/2 existence 2 quake 4 unreal 2 and on the minute s.t.a.l.ok.e.r shadow of chernoybl on a 4 twelve months previous geforce fx 5200 with 256 on board. no probs as yet.
2009-09-11 23:52:36 UTC
I personally would go for a 9800GTX. Or a GTS in the 200 series.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...